Interest groups are voluntary associations that aim to influence public policy or promote a specific cause. Interest groups emphasize the importance of a particular factor in society of which they seek to create an advantage or protection for in order to yield the benefits. Interest groups advocate for an array of policies, from environmental policies to corporate policies to political policies. Interest groups conduct their duties on the basis of having common interests among a group of people (Baker and Losco 15).
Economic interest groups nationwide attempt to influence economic policies within the country that has an impact on all the states. These interest groups represent big businesses and corporations and seek to create favorable economic climates for the profitability of their enterprises. Economic interest groups in California, however, seek to influence economic policies within the state of California without these policies necessarily having an impact in other states (Baker and Losco 18). These interest groups represent the largest companies and businesses based in California and seek to create favorable business terms for these corporations operating specifically within the state.
Non-economic interest groups nationwide advocate to influence public policies on matters such as environmental policies, government actions and religious activities. Non-economic interest groups operating in California advocate for these policies on a state level without necessarily affecting other states.[“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
In California, there are a number of reasons that account for differences in voter turnout in the elections. First, there is a difference in voter turnout in California because there are different types of elections to contend with. There is a different turnout for the elections involving state political positions such as that for the governor because this position specifically affects California. The different voter turnout in California can also be accounted for by the diverse demographic composition of the state because there are varying levels of the majority and minority groups that show up for elections (Charles and Jr, Melvin 65) Similarly, voter turnout is different in California also because of the mandatory presentation of identification during voting that is different from other states. Some of the laws and regulations guiding the voting process in California is fairly different than on a national level, and this accounts for the difference in voter turnout within the state.[Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
On a national level, voter turnout differences can be explained by a host of reasons, including the differences in the election type in each state. Voter turnout in some states appears to be higher for presidential elections than state elections, while in other states, the opposite is true (Gatrell and Bierly 133). The election type has a significant impact on the number of voters who will turn out on election day to cast their ballot. Similarly, the competitiveness of the election in each state determines the voter turnout; for instance, in 2012, 66% of eligible voters turned out to cast their ballot in the country’s 12 most competitive states, while only 57% eligible voters turned out in the other states (Enos and Fowler 8). The importance that each state has in the electoral college plays an important role in influencing voters to turn out to cast their ballot, thus influencing voter turnout across the country[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
Baker, Joseph and Losco, Ralph. Am Gov (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008. Print
Charles, Kerwin Kofi and Jr, Melvin Stephens. Employment, Wages and Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011. Print
Enos, Ryan D. and Fowler, Anthony. Pivotality and Turnout: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Aftermath of a Tied Election. Political Science Research and Methods: 1–11, 2014.
Gatrell, Jay D. and Bierly, Gregory D. Weather and Voter Turnout: Kentucky Primary and General Elections, 1990-2000. Southeastern Geographer 42 (1): 114–134, 2013.