Images communicate to people differently and ignite different feelings. The story that any image will tell to its viewers is the greatest. However, from the artistic view, different information and analysis shade more light on similarity and differences of images. In this case, whoever makes any comparison may not say whether they love the image or not but will give the details and contents of a picture as they appear (Dan 4). For clarity, this paper analyses two images; one of New York City from the old days and the other a shading of Jesus Christ during resurrection. In the details, the content, context, similarities and differences between the two images are shown clearly.
The first image about New York shows people along a street. Buildings and vehicles can be seen. The American flags are hanging on some building on the left side. Traffic lights are erected on the roads with people and drivers probably waiting for their turn to cross. This aerial view shows a town not congested with cars and people as it would be in the modern state of New York. Other details like the distinct colors of the people and features in the image may not be clear because of the limit of a black and white character of the photo. [“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
The second image is that of Jesus Christ during the resurrection. In the middle of the picture is Jesus Christ himself. From Biblical texts, he was adorned in white before burial. That would have guided the painter to use the white color for his robe. Two people, one on the left and another on the right, appear to be reaching for his hands. He is standing on some elevated platform, which resembles an altar. On each side, more people are gathered and gazing at him. One can easily conclude that they are amazed at what they are seeing. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
The images are in different circumstances. First, that of New York City indicates some economic development was going on in the place. The vehicles, roads and people in a town are measures of economic development and growth. In the image, some people could be on their way to work as others could be from work. The road, which appears to be tarmacked, is a sign of modern times of development by man. One can speculate the conditions of such a city in the older years, something not easy to find an answer for.
The second image is in a spiritual context. People are told of the resurrection of Christ. Adam and Eve, who were the first people to come on earth, are mentioned. People are wondering the magic of the fulfillment of such prophecies. During that time, people some people had begun to forget Jesus as some were anticipating how he would come back after three days of stay in the grave, he resurrected in what caught most people unawares.
To understand the full contexts of these images, one must be acquainted with two things; knowledge in history and religion. History will be an indicator of the situation of New York during 1945, a year after World War II. The types of cars and the approximate number of people per square mile will help one judge the image in a better way. On the second picture, religious knowledge informs one to decide the period in the Bible when the image is drawn from. If people have better information about these times in the history of man, then they will either justify or oppose what is communicated here.
These images have some similarities. The times when they are set to talk to people are old and long past. When they were taken or drawn, nobody had an idea what the development in photography would bring to image storage (Chambers, 34). Photography had not developed well, and that is why most details like people’s faces are not clear. New York City is growing while the photo about Jesus Christ is immediately after the resurrection. In the later, stone tablets were used to store information. Between 1930 and 1970 when this image was taken, Benjamin (13) states that development of photographic technology was in process and most was black and white. It does not give clear details of how color and texture differed.
The orientation of the images is at a wide angle. Such an orientation gives a wider view of the image and other details around it. One may not know the exact thing that the photographer or the painter wanted to show. For the first image, it is not easy to understand where exactly the focus was. The second image appears to be more about Jesus, whom the painter shows in large paintings than other subjects around. A viewer can conclude that these images were meant to show everything that appeared on it. Be it people, roads, buildings, flags, and clothes.
The scale of the images is also small. The pixelation rate is high and details may be lost while zooming. Comparing these images with that taken today, technology allow one to zoom to some higher power and get the finest details (Chambers, 78). If that were possible with these photos, then the people in both cases would be identified.
One image is colored, and the other is in black and white. This difference between the two is because of the different ways the images were brought to existence. The first is a photo, and the latter is a drawing and painting. Chambers, (15) says that painted images are not the exact forms of what existed. The painter looks at another image or imagination to draw. Such drawings may not be refuted easily nor criticized. They are the decisions of an artist (Chambers, 15). The New York City photo is a real image as at that time. It shows the specific events, which is the reason why cameras were developed, according to Imagine Publishing House (45). Nobody would oppose what the image shows. A lot of information can be found to prove the image and its contents.
The coloration of one image and photo are not real situations. Colors existed during both times, but the representations may differ. The elements of color show some advanced technology or technique used to show the differences (Dan, 91). They are not the captured at the same time. One is more advanced than the other. If the same images were captured today, they would so similar features. Maybe, the characters in both may have differed, but the appearance and matters of scale would be similar.
To conclude, people would gauge images depending on how they are convinced by them. The stories that images tell is the first item that people check in them. How the images are represented are factors of technology and experience. They can be photographed or painted. The times in history will dictate what technique some use. Though photography existed long ago, it does not show a lot if poorly done. The same applies to paintings. The artist must have sharp memories and skills to show the exact information in the images.[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
Cawthra, Benjamin. Blue notes in black and white: photography and jazz. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Chambers, Timothy. The art of drawing & painting portraits. Publishers Group UK, 2012.
Dan, Alphonso. Pen & ink drawing: a simple guide. Three Minds Press, 2015.Imagine.
Publishing. The black & white photography book. 2nd Ed., Imagine Publishing, 2013.