Violent media involves the display of violent actions in audio- visual means of communication, especially in television programs. Many research programs have been conducted, and conclusions on the effects of violent media on children have been discovered. A report in 1982 by the National Institute of Mental Health came up with three major effects of children watching violent content on the television. They include; children were becoming less sensitive to pain and suffering of other individuals. They may also become fearful of the people and the environment around them. Another major effect is that they may behave aggressively or act in harmful ways towards their colleagues (Association, n.d.). Children will also tend to see violence as means of solving conflicts among themselves. They also become anti-social in a way that it becomes difficult to fit into the social world. In a sample of the report on the congressional public health summit, 2000 it expressed various facts supporting the above effects of violent media (Neal, 2002).[Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
However, according to Gerald Jones, he said that violent media had a positive impact on the social lives of people. He argues that violent entertainment contributes to a healthy development of the young ones. Children, according to Jones, choose their superheroes very carefully. For him, his superhero was Hulk from the Marvel comics. He also came to write his comic books and action movies due to the influence by reading many comic books and encountering many superheroes.
Jones asks parents, teachers, and guardians of the next generation to evaluate and learn why entertainment is appealing to the children and the youth and establish a means of developing them naturally. Violent media content equips children with skills required in day to day life.[“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]Some of the benefits that are associated with violent media, according to toJones, are included; enabling a child to be stronger, trust their emotions and being able to withstand any pressure from the society and especially of the pop culture (Neal, 2002).
Jones was of the opinion that violent television programs should only have an adverse effect if the kids are not in a position to openly discuss it with their guardians. That view was based on the fact that if a child is interested in scary and violent content, then the parents should relate to him or she in this area by discussing the events viewed in the program. On the other hand, denying the child the access to the strong programs that the like will lead to rebellion and hence worsen the parent-child relationship.
A clearer perception of the positive impacts of violent content in the media is depicted by his life story. As earlier stated he was a fan of comic book and eventually got to write his comics. He says that he allows his child to watch violent television shows as it allows his son “to negotiate the inner self and public self.”
Jones opinions are also supported by Melanie Moore, a Ph.D. holder in psychology, and Fowles, the author of the book “The Case for Television Violence” (Sage Publications). They both say that violent television content is therapeutic for the general population. They are of the opinion that violent entertainment is required for exploration of the unavoidable feelings and emotions they have been taught to deny. They agree with Jones that such scenes tend to pull people out of the emotional traps and barriers confined in (Folkenflic & Sun, 2000). In his encounter with Moore, he developed a program that would assist the young generation in improving their self-knowledge and sense of being effective and capacity to produce. Fowler quotes Michael Moriarity “Dramatic violence is the most useful tool for telling the invisible tale of right and wrong,” and “Violent drama has been the hallmark of every major civilization since the Greeks. It is not a disease. It is an immunization against the disease.”
In his book, it is clearly depicted that he is not in agreement with the pop psychologists who claim that the shootings in schools are caused by viewing of the violent content in the television shows. He says that any pop-culture story has its purpose regarding development. He goes further and emphasizes on supernatural characters having a hand in helping kids overcome powerlessness of the fact that they are young and small hence vulnerable. His argument is that children should be left to explore their feelings and fantasies as this would be blocking them from power and selfhood.
His assertions are however based on his life only, therefore, the information in his book does not apply to all other individuals. His information is based only on his findings of him observing his son, therefore, the information is insignificant for those kids that behave differently. Jones’ argument is valid, however comparing to the negative impacts of violent content it may seem that his findings are not logical. This is also apparent as most professionals including psychologists differ as more has been portrayed of the negative impacts rather than the positive impacts (Kaplan, 2012).[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
Response to the presentation
Gerald Jones raises a valid view that is supported by few. He is careful to say that violent media is not harmless. His opinion is seen as optimism towards violent entertainment as he went through the experience of watching violent television shows and he did not turn out to be aggressive as suggested by the psychologist. His son suffers the same exposure and does not prove to be harmful. In his book, he points out that for violent material not to have negative impacts on the young generation then parents should get involved and allow an open discussion on such content.
However, based on research conducted by the psychologist, the best way forward for violent media is to restrict it to the children. This is because a child is prone to easy persuasion compared to an adult as compared to an adult as they lack experience and are in the process of learning. Therefore, putting Jones writings into consideration may be risky for a child. From the facts outlined in the congressional public health summit, 2000 statistics disagree with the opinions of Gerald Jones. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
The degree of violence in a program should be put into consideration in the evaluation of the impacts of violent media. In Jones case, the Marvel comics may be considered to be less violent as compared to other scary movies. Therefore, Jones opinions are misleading as his evaluation of content exposed to be very shallow. And, a personal experience should not be used to prove an idea or opinion. My conclusion is that violent media should be restricted to children.
Association, A. P.
Retrieved from Neal, R. (2002, June 21). Media Violence Good For Children? – CBS News.
FOLKENFLIK, D., & Sun, B. (2000, July 29). Can TV Violence Be Good for You? – latimes.
Kaplan, A. (2012, October 5). Violence in the Media: What Effects on Behavior? | Psychiatric Times.