ORDER NOW
Essay Writing Sample: Tentative Reference List
Posted by: Write My Essay on: September 26, 2018

Sample by My Essay Writer

 

Alcaraz, C. & Zeadally, S. (2015). Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8, 53-66.

Alcaraz and Zeadally (2015) present ideologies on the interests of infrastructure in cyberspace as a supporting facility of daily activities in a nation. Concepts, therefore, involve the control and facilitation of other infrastructure, both along the lines of security and vulnerability within this space. Based on such assessments, the concepts attempt to recommend solutions, protocols to facilitate self-healing, and protection of these infrastructures in the contemporary sense. CI’s, according to the theoretical framework, function within the national importance of national functions of security, public health, and economy, and in this way, their interaction with cyberspace in protective interests of the nation (Alcaraz & Zeadally, 2015). Also, the discussion of the defense industry captures the relationships between each protective facet in the economy (Alcaraz & Zeadally, 2015).

Through the interactions of cyber, geographic, physical, or logical interdependency relationships, the presence of a security function in each of the infrastructures compares to the presence of information systems. Inasmuch as the proximity of either relationship may not adequately define the threat of vulnerability or a threat, the systems can either be assessed regarding faults or external offensives within these proximities (Alcaraz & Zeadally, 2015). The theoretical presentation of vector based analysis of systemic weaknesses in RTUs, SCADA systems, and general ICTs present the authors with the opportunity to consider the technological limitations in critical infrastructure, which offer architectural complexities.[“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]

Givens, A. D., & Busch, N. E. (2013). Realizing the promise of public-private partnerships in U.S. critical infrastructure protection. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 6(1), 39-50.

Givens and Busch (2013) attempt to compare the protection of the critical infrastructure in public and private institutions towards the provision of solutions to security challenges. With interests in the efforts in cross-sector communication and protection as a function of partnership, these authors establish the process of ensuring homeland security in the protection intention presented by the vulnerabilities in the systems (Givens & Busch, 2013). In their attempt to bolster these partnerships, Givens and Busch (2013) consider the position of threats ranging from terrorism to criminal attacks to failures in either of the nationally significant infrastructure. Also, the position of the government in relation to that of private players in the field matches the discussion of challenges towards efficiency and effectiveness of security as a function of infrastructural design (Givens & Busch, 2013). Similarly, it is possible to the research question for the discussion to borrow from this reference concerning the process of the positioning of CI’s in secure and functional environments, and in this way, minimize threats on both internal and external settings.

Ouyang, M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43-60.

Infrastructure systems can be considered to being interdependent on various levels in their performance which not only increases the possibility of risk of failure on a connected basis but also preconditions the systems towards maintenance and emergency risk. Ouyang (2014) reviews content on the field’s position regarding such interdependence and evaluates the fundamental design and operational principles of the systems. The discussions facilitate a rationale for comparing the criteria of the resilience of both infrastructure and supporting systems in the field. Regarding the changes in contemporary systems design in different areas, it is possible for one to use such concepts to understand the position of such design processes as functions of security performance based on interdependencies of various types. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]

Ouyang (2014) compares the position of the interdependence of facilities in the entire infrastructural system to full systems in other fields, and further analyzes the ability of such systems to communicate and function. Such discussions add to the position of understanding the reliability of infrastructure, materials, inputs, and outputs towards centralized processes and systems. The analysis of the topic, therefore, aims at using the information from the necessary functionality of one system to facilitate another within secure and practical national environments of consumption of such system-based services.

Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2012). Critical infrastructure protection: The vulnerability conundrum. Telematics and Informatics, 29(1), 56-65.

The discussion of the possibility of vulnerabilities in communication-based communications is a significant argumentative point in the assessment of the consumptive perspective. Through a basis of elicitation processes, it becomes possible for Murray and Grubesic (2012) to compare reference points within a functional system of the entire world of critical infrastructure. The vulnerabilities of cyberspace in a local setting can be considered as a position for the entire national and international system of interactive infrastructure, and according to Murray and Grubesic (2012), critical infrastructure protection is a utility of integrated facilities within various sectors of operation. The necessity of appreciating the conundrum under discussion in the completion of the intended analysis of security conditions of CIS’s links directly to the current state of such infrastructure. Through the use of existing protocols in the safeguarding of these critical systems, one can analyze the potential within other environments hosting related infrastructure or similarly vulnerable systems. The approach to protection, as suggested within by Murray and Grubesic (2012) is only in the physical sense of provision of service, with the disregard to other possible resources for consideration on a virtual space (such as cyberspace). However, their concepts prove necessary in the formulation of better approaches to creating secure infrastructure systems and offering additional cover of vulnerabilities through the integration of interdependent secure networks and utility support systems.

May, P. J., & Koski, C. (2013). Addressing public risks: Extreme events and critical infrastructures. Review of Policy Research, 30(2), 139-159.

The possibility of using non-coercive means for connecting national critical infrastructure forms the basis for the discussion by May and Koski (2013), whereby their research raises the need for a balance between roles by the government and the private sector. The protective actions where the sustenance of the infrastructural systems is achievable relates to the communities pursuing the solutions for the reduction of risks.[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]The ability of the governmental organizations to interact with these communities, therefore, offers the capability of their research process to focus on the partnerships and balancing of purpose achievable in partnerships. These research concepts relate to the topic of the project through the provision of standpoints assumed within the consideration of security, the interrelation between organs and general interdependence of systems wherever participants do not achieve balance (May & Koski, 2013).

References

Alcaraz, C., & Zeadally, S. (2015). Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8, 53-66.

Givens, A. D., & Busch, N. E. (2013). Realizing the promise of public-private partnerships in U.S. critical infrastructure protection. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 6(1), 39-50.

May, P. J., & Koski, C. (2013). Addressing public risks: Extreme events and critical infrastructures. Review of Policy Research, 30(2), 139-159.

Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2012). Critical infrastructure protection: The vulnerability conundrum. Telematics and Informatics, 29(1), 56-65.

Ouyang, M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43-60.

Tentative Bibliography

Alcaraz, C., & Zeadally, S. (2015). Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8, 53-66.

Baroud, H., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J. E., & Rocco, C. M. (2014). Inherent costs and interdependent impacts of infrastructure network resilience. Risk Analysis, 35(4), 642-662.

Givens, A. D., & Busch, N. E. (2013). Realizing the promise of public-private partnerships in U.S. critical infrastructure protection. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 6(1), 39-50.

Hall, J. W., Henriques, J. J., Hickford, A. J., Nicholls, R. J., Baruah, P., Birkin, M., … Watson, J. W. (2014). Assessing the long-term performance of cross-sectoral strategies for national infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20(3), 04014014.

Jaatun, M. G. (2015). Security in Critical Information Infrastructures (Ph.D. thesis). University of Stavanger, Norway.

May, P. J., & Koski, C. (2013). Addressing public risks: Extreme events and critical infrastructures. Review of Policy Research, 30(2), 139-159.

Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2012). Critical infrastructure protection: The vulnerability conundrum. Telematics and Informatics, 29(1), 56-65.

Ouyang, M. (2014). Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 43-60.

Wang, S., Hong, L., & Chen, X. (2012). Vulnerability analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems: A methodological framework. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(11), 3323-3335

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *