Advances in research pertaining to the quality of public health on environment have shown remarkable results. A growing interest in this field has been attributable to the need to enhance public health quality. Concerning the aspects such as the loss of biodiversity, urban sprawl, the widespread nature of non-communicable diseases, discourses on nature studies vis-à-vis the ecological factors, could be a fodder for scholarly inquisitiveness (Zelenski & Nisbet, 2014). Under these considerations, arguments abound within the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches for better concept to enhance positive health outcomes. Scholars have documented that ecodiversity plays a significant role in environmental research studies, hence the need to encourage researchers to scan individual nature connectedness and how such influences might affect the lifestyles and interactions.[“Write my essay for me?” Get help here.]
Nature relatedness explores the levels of individual connectedness or linkage with the natural environment. According to Zelenski and Nisbet (2014), nature relatedness is akin to the deeper ecological concepts, which are attributable to the natural world. Nature relatedness redirects appreciation for and conceptualization of the human interrelationships with the natural world. According to Dutcher, Finley, Luloff and Buttolph (2007), nature relatedness is distinct from environmentalism. Their exploration goes beyond activism; the focus of green politics. Nature relatedness neither denotes the love for nature, or the attribution of pleasant facets of nature. Notably, nature relatedness fronts a deeper abstract understanding of the significance of all the aspects of nature, including those, which are not appealingly oriented or directly beneficial to humanity, such as pests and rodents (Nisbet, 2013). Nature relatedness consists of the cognitive and physical connections that humanity has with nature. As an area that enhances identification with nature, nature relatedness tends to collate the human thoughts and feelings about individual connections to nature (Capaldi, Dopko, & Zelenski, 2014). Nature relatedness also reflects a peripheral perspective in that, it offers a nature-linked worldview concerning human activities and the impacts of such activities on the environment. Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, and Buttolph (2007) opines that nature relatedness also mirror physical fluency with the natural world and enhances the awareness the immediate surrounding.
Whilst not every connection between happiness and nature could be discerned across these studies, the general patterns of the results are a pointer to important inferences:
Emotional relatedness to nature is distinguishable from other psychological affiliations in the lives of humanity.
Nature relatedness has a way of predicting happiness regardless of the situation which might be characterized by other psychological factors.
Psychological relatedness with nature often facilitates sustainable approaches to the natural world, and may offer an important impetus to preserve the natural environment.
The study seeks to enhance the understanding of the ways in which the ecological factors exert selective strains on individuals and to what extent such strains impact psychology (Zelenski & Nisbet, 2014). In this therefore, psychological anthropology stands out as a study of wellness, which takes advantage of the special places in a number of faculties including medicine and science (Zelenski & Nisbet, 2014). Usually, most of the studies, which spring from other disciplines, such as psychology, health, and environmental sciences are somewhat detached from physiological anthropology (Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, & Buttolph, 2007). On the other hand, some research insights explore that psychological anthropology stand aloof from other related fields within this area of study.
Detachments from the natural environment could be the main contributor of the destruction of the planet. Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) suggest a new construct with a built-in scale, which assesses the efficacy, cognitive, as well as the experiential characteristics of humanity’s connection to nature. In their first study, Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) explored the internal aspects of the nature relatedness in a sample of student participants through factor analysis. In phase, the authors tested the hypothesis validity of nature relatedness with respect to variety of personality and environmental measures (Zelenski & Nisbet, 2014). In their second study, Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) fronted experience sampling methodology to establish whether if nature connectedness individuals spend more time in the open, to experience nature fully. Across studies, nature connectedness showed a closer relationship with environmental scales, lifestyles, and time frequencies secondary to validity and reliability of NR (Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, & Buttolph, 2007). The potentiality of nature connectedness as a useful tool for studying human-nature interactions as well as the underlying processes to environmental shrewdness is discussed widely. [Need an essay writing service? Find help here.]
Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) conducted binary nature focused study with one concern in mind: Is feeling nature connectedness associated with personal happiness? In their first study, the authors measured the feelings of individuals’ connectedness across diverse settings, including nature. The termed as relatedness, the concept of how people emotionally connect to their natural world. Applying a Likert-type gauge, participants in this study rated their relatedness to nature by their conception of self and that of the natural environment. The results found that among the different happiness scales from various participants, the link between happiness and nature was highly obvious. Besides, the results demonstrate that not every individual that lives in the natural habitat and seem to appreciate it automatically receive the benefits attached to it (Zelenski & Nisbet, 2014). Besides, nature relatedness and other analogous psychological benefits attached, have close connection with the mental well-being of individuals whether they subscribe to the natural world or not (Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, & Buttolph, 2007). Briefly, nature relatedness and the scales attributed to it can measure the fascination of individuals who have interest in nature, and desire to connect with it. The measurements offered by Zelenski and Nisbet (2014), transcends the bounds of superficial affection to nature, and taps into the consciousness and concept of the natural world. In these studies, general connectedness predicted happiness in humans, while nature relatedness occurred as a significant and distinct indicator of numerous happiness pointers, which stayed on even after controlling other forms of connections. Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) results backs the idea that nature connectedness could be a route to human happiness as well as environmental sustainability. However, by confirming this causal pointer, the results of these studies provoke the need to explore additional research in this area.
The primary objective of this study was to explore the association between nature connectedness and happiness while considering whether this relationship is due to a universal sense of relatedness or a more explicit connection with nature. Zelenski and Nisbet (2014) replicated earlier research studies showing that personal relatedness with nature and other aspects inherent within it envisages happiness. Significantly, though, nature connectedness remained a vital pointer of most indicators to happiness. Again, despite some discrepancies in their findings, the patterns displayed by the assessment tools, samples, and a range of happiness indicators are pointers enough to enhance their predictions (Craig, Logan, & Prescott, 2016). These results of these studies put forward that nature connectedness has a distinctive happiness clout, which is hard to dismiss in a variety of social or cultural settings.[Click Essay Writer to order your essay]
One of the most important objectives of this study was to determine whether the feeling nature connectedness is associated with personal happiness. More precisely, the researchers sought to determine whether nature is the sole determinant of the things that makes people feel more associated to life, thereby giving them a sense of contentment. Results suggest that nature connectedness has a distinct touch to happiness benefit, and this goes beyond the more comprehensive advantage of being compassionate about to one’s family, friends, home and country. From the forgoing analysis, it is evident that the human connectedness to nature corresponds to varieties of human welfare, thus nature connectedness plays an extremely vital role in upholding positive mental health. While these studies offer a rich data on the bond between happiness and nature, they nonetheless, build on numerous previous studies, which link the health and welfare of humanity to the natural world. In essence, pursuing these knowledgebase data gives rise to a whole new area of study that warrants the input of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approach, which includes psychologists, ecologists, spiritualists, and philosophers. The positive link between nature and happiness epitomes the synergistic correlation between personal health and the well-being of the natural habitat. In the modern day globalized society, the human craving for the natural world supersedes all other demands because this is the hallmark of sustainable growth and development. Ideally, the human positive connection to nature is the best bet for all generations to relish refined health, happiness, and welfare. These very connections are apt because they have the surety of healing the planet, while imparting a sense of environmental consciousness in individuals.
Zelenski, J. & Nisbet, E. (2014) Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1) 3–23.
Nisbet, E. (2013). Nature relatedness – individuals’ connectedness with nature and the role in motivating environmental concern and behavior. Clean Water Summit. Trent University.
Dutcher, D., Finley, J., Luloff, A., & Buttolph, J. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474–493.
Capaldi, C., Dopko, R., & Zelenski, J. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.
Craig, J., Logan, A., & Prescott, S. (2016). Natural environments, nature relatedness and the ecological theater: connecting satellites and sequencing to shinrin-yoku. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 5(1), 1-56.